Month: December 2012

Arbitration/Enforceability/Homeowners: California Supreme Court’s Decision In Pinnacle Requires Reversal In Another Case Of Order Denying Developer’s Motion To Compel Arbitration

     On August 16, 2012, we blogged about the California Supreme Court’s decision (actually, a majority, concurrences, and a dissent) in Pinnacle Museum Tower Association v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLC, 55 Cal.4th 223 (2012).  That case held that covenants, conditions and restrictions of a recorded declaration created by a developer, which contain an arbitration […]

Arbitration/Employment/Interpretation/Enforceability: Despite Signed, Integrated Employment Contract Without Arbitration Provision, Employee Ends Up Bound to Arbitrate By Subsequent Unsigned Arbitration Provision

December 5, 2012 · Uncategorized

  At-Will Nature of Employment Allowed Employer To Introduce New Policies Without A Signed Writing      At first, we were going to file this unpublished opinion under “go figure”, but we think we get it.  In 2003, employee Krishna Papudesi, a systems analyst with Northrop, signed an integrated employment contract with her employer having no […]