Category: Arbitration: Sanctions

Sanctions: 4th Dist. Div. 3 Affirms Sanctions For Frivolous Opposition To Proceedings To Confirm Arbitration Award

March 5, 2025 · Arbitration: Sanctions

Once Again, Judicial Review Of Arbitration Awards Is Extremely Limited.         Kenneth J. Catanzarite, representing plaintiffs, filed an opposition to defendant's petition to confirm the award. The court imposed $37,000 in sanctions against Catanzarite for presenting unsupported and meritless arguments, including a claim that the arbitrator had refused to consider evidence, despite no evidence supporting […]

Arbitration, Disclosures: Arbitrator’s Nondisclosure Of Involvement With LGBTQ Organization Not A Basis For Tossing Arbitration Award

The Arbitrator's Relationship With  GLAAD Was Irrelevant To The Dispute.         The arbitration award was confirmed and affirmed on appeal in Malek Media Group LLC v. AXQG Corp.,  B299743  (12/16/20 )) (Dhanidina, Lavin, Egerton), a case in which the disgruntled appealing party sought to disqualify the arbitrator for failure to disclose his connection with […]

Arbitration: Sanctions: N.D. Cal. District Judge Has Decided To Issue Sanctions Against Fitbit And Its Attorneys For Failure To Pursue Arbitration After Compelling It In Consumer Action

July 26, 2018 · Arbitration: Sanctions

Moral Here Is To Pursue Arbitration If You Elect To Do So.             Mike Hensley, my co-contributor on the calattorneysfees.com website, has done a recent post about N.D. Cal. U.S. District James Donato’s July 24, 2018 order in which he will be imposing yet-to-be-sought sanctions against Fitbit and its defense counsel in a consumer action. […]

Arbitration, Appealability, Fees, Estoppel, Waiver, Sanctions: Fourth Dist. Div. 3: “This Is An Appeal Borne Of Sharp Practices”

Waiver, Invited Error, And Sharp Practices Doom The Appeal.             Justice Ikola grabs the reader by the lapels in the opening lines of Diaz v. Professional Community Management, Inc., G053909 (4/3 certified for pub. 11/8/17) (Ikola, O'Leary, Aronson):  "A 'sharp practice' is defined as a 'dealing in which advantage is taken or sought unscrupulously. […]

Arbitration/Sanctions: Sixth District Holds CCP 128.7 Sanctions Are Unavailable In Arbitration Where Attorney Has Not “Presented” Pleading To Court

December 6, 2013 · Arbitration: Sanctions

Trial Court’s Order Denying Sanctions Under CCP 128.7 Is Affirmed      In Optimal Markets, Inc. v. Salant, Case No. H038571 (6th Dist. Nov. 26, 2013) (unpublished), the Court explains:  “There is no authority supporting the position that a superior court, after a matter has been stayed and ordered to binding arbitration, may impose section 128.7 […]