Author: calmediation

Arbitration/Fees/Construction: Fifth District Agrees Attorney’s Fees Clause Provided For Recovery Of Fees Only In Arbitration, Not In Superior Court

  Parties’ Agreement To Litigate In Superior Court Proved Fatal To Prevailing Party’s Fee Recovery      Plaintiff Mari sued Defendant Hawkins for professional negligence in connection with a survey, and prevailed in the trial court. However, the trial court denied Plaintiff’s request for attorney’s fees, because the fee provision was part of an arbitration provision […]

Marc Alexander

June 24, 2012 · Uncategorized

Marc Alexander is of counsel in the Santa Ana office of AlvaradoSmith APC, and a member of the Firm’s litigation department. He has over 30 years of experience in bench and jury trials, binding arbitrations, judicial references, mediations, and appellate work in state and federal courts in California.    Mr. Alexander received his B.A. with honors […]

Contact Me

June 24, 2012 · Uncategorized

Email:  calmediation@gmail.com Telephone:  714 852-6800 Marc Alexander  

In the News: $5M Award In FINRA Arbitration, $21.6M Award in JAMS Arbitration

June 21, 2012 · News

Are Arbitrators Stingier Than Trial Court Judges? Payback in FINRA Arbitration      Bill Singer comments about a FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) arbitration in the June 20, 2012 on-line edition of Forbes, under the heading, “Former Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Brokers Win $5 Million Employment Dispute Arbitration Award.”  We surmise some of the conduct may […]

Mediation/Settlement/CCP Section 664.6: Those Who Signed The Settlement Agreement Could Enforce It, And Those Who Didn’t Couldn’t

  Enforcing Settlement Agreement Under CCP 664.6 Requires Strict Compliance With Statute      The next case teaches us about the need to strictly comply with Cal. Code Civ. Proc. section 664.6 in order to enforce a settlement agreement under that provision. Hampton-Mitchell v. Mitchell, Case No. B228988 (2nd Dist. Div. 7 June 20, 2012) (Zelon, […]

Arbitration/Enforceability/Employment: Requiring Employee To Agree To Arbitration Provision Is Not By Itself Wrongfully Coercive, Despite Loss Of Right To A Jury

  Labor Code Section 206.5 Prohibits Employer From Obtaining Release of Claim For Wages Under Specified Circumstances, But Does Not Preclude Employee From Waiving Right to Jury By Agreeing To Arbitrate      The scenario is familiar: Employee (Pulli) sues employer (Pony International, LLC), for wrongful termination and other claims. Because employee signed an arbitration provision, […]

Arbitration/Fees/Rules/Scope: Trial Court Affirmed in Case Involving Arbitrator’s Authority, Rules, Sanctions, and Fees

Plus We Learn Some Legal Arcana     The next case, though unpublished, covers several interesting issues concerning the arbitrator’s authority, rules, sanctions, and fees. Prime Associates Group, LLC v. NAMA Holdings, LLC, Case No. B226167 (2nd Dist. Div. 4 June 19, 2012) (Suzukawa, J., author) (not for publication).       The case involved a messy dispute […]

Arbitration/Waiver/Burden of Proof: Substantial Evidence Supported Waiver of FINRA Arbitration

  St. Agnes Factors Weighted In Favor of Finding of a Waiver      The leading California case for determining whether a waiver of the right to arbitrate has occurred is St. Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of California, 31 Cal.4th 1187 (2003). St. Agnes provides a multi-factor test that the court handily applied in Alspaugh […]

Mediation/Condition Precedent/Fees: Listing Agreement Required Mediation Before Commencing Litigation – But Promissory Note Did Not Have That Requirement

  . . . And So Party Suing and Prevailing On the Promissory Note Could Recover Fees Without Initiating Mediation      We have a sidebar category, "Mediation: Condition Precedent," reflecting the fact that many contracts, such as real estate purchase and sale agreements, and listing agreements, now require a party to mediate before filing a […]