Author: calmediation

Arbitration/CCP 1281.2/Enforceability: Opponent’s Filing Of Lawsuit Constitutes Refusal To Arbitrate

Fourth District, Division 3 Publishes To Distinguish Mansouri v. Superior Court.      California Code of Civil Procedure, section 1281.2 requires that a party seeking to compel arbitration allege, “the existence of a written agreement to arbitrate a controversy and that a party thereto refuses to arbitrate such controversy.”  The question in Hyundai Amco America, Inc. […]

Mediation/Settlement Agreement/Confidentiality: Settlement Agreement Enforced Under CCP 664.6 Against George R. Hearst’s Widow

Famous Family, Simple Legal Principles.       Though the opinion opens with a fanfare announcing, “George R. Hearst, Jr. . . scion of the wealthy Hearst family,” the facts and legal points are actually pretty simple.       George and Susan Hearst married in 1998, and entered into a marital property agreement (MPA) in 2002, whereby Susan […]

Arbitration/Unconscionability/Employment: First District, Division 3, Holds Specific Arbitration Provision Between Law Firm And Former Attorney Is Unconscionable

Arbitration  Provision Failed Armendariz Tests.      Nelson v. Tucker Ellis, LLP is somewhat atypical, because it was the former attorney, rather than his former law firm, who “seized the bull by the horns”, initiating suit, and contending that the law firm released attorney Nelson’s privileged work product to other counsel, thereby interfering with his employment […]

Arbitration/Scope: Coverage And Policy Interpretation Disputes Are Beyond Scope Of Agreement To Arbitrate Appraisal Dispute

December 8, 2014 · Arbitration: Scope

Court Of Appeal Affirms Order Denying Policy Holder’s Petition To Compel Arbitration Of Appraisal Dispute.       Despite countervailing considerations that favor arbitration, California courts continue to deny petitions to compel arbitration for the simplest of reasons:  the dispute is beyond the scope of the arbitration agreement.  Such was the case in Moghtader v. Travelers Commercial […]

Sixth District Affirms Trial Court’s Order Denying Cisco’s Motion To Compel Arbitration, Based On Independent Review That Backflip’s Claims Are Not Covered By Arbitration Clause

Strong Policy In Favor Of Arbitration Yields To Court’s Independent Review Of What Parties Intended By Their Contractual Language.      In Backflip Software, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. H040382 (6th Dist. Dec. 3, 2014) (Bamattre-Manoukian, Elia, Mihara) (unpublished), the Court concludes, based on its independent review of contractual language, the trial court did not err […]

Arbitration/Fees/Vacatur: Arbitrator Who Applies Statutory Definition of “Prevailing Party” To Award Fees Rather Than Contractual Definition Does Not Exceed His Powers

Court Does Not Decide Whether Contractual Provision Limiting Arbitrator’s Power To Apply Definition Of “Prevailing Party” Other Than Found In Agreement Would Be Unenforceable As Violative Of Public Policy.      Does an arbitrator who applies the statutory definition of “prevailing party” found in Civil Code Section 1717(b)(1), rather than than the definition the parties contractually […]

California Supreme Court Holds That Arbitrator May Rule On Pitchess Discovery Motion For Officer Personnel Records

Justice Werdegar Concurs and Dissents.      The California Supreme Court held today, “that when hearing an administrative appeal from discipline imposed on a correctional officer, an arbitrator may rule upon a discovery motion for officer personnel records, commonly referred to as a Pitchess motion.”  Riverside County Sheriff’s Department v. Stiglitz, S206350 (Dec. 1, 2014) (Cordigan […]

Arbitration/Deadlines/Correction: Arbitrator Did Not Exceed Powers By Awarding Post-Termination Royalties After License Agreement Ended And Appellant Missed Deadline To Seek Correction Of Award

Post-Termination Of License Royalties Were Part Of $128.3M Arbitration Award.      In Amkor Technology, Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., A139596 (1/3 Nov. 25, 2014) (Pollak, Siggins, Jenkins) (unpublished), the Court of Appeal affirmed part of a larger arbitration award for $128.3M.     Procedural hurdle.       Appellant Amkor stumbled on a procedural hurdle:  Its petition to correct […]

Scope Of Arbitration: Dispute Was Outside Scope Of Arbitration Provision Relating To Conflicts Of Interest, As Court Of Appeal Refuses To “Handcuff” Parties To Position Taken In Discovery

November 25, 2014 · Arbitration: Scope

Plaintiffs Manage To Distance Themselves From Discovery Response, Allowing Them To Avoid Having To Arbitrate Their Malpractice Claims.      By a deft interrogatory, Defendant tried to corner Plaintiffs into having to arbitrate their malpractice claims in LADT, LLC v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP, B246649 (2/1 Nov. 25, 2014) (Miller, Rothschild, Johnson) (unpublished).      The gravamen of […]