Who Decides Illegality Of A Contract, The Arbitrator Or The Court? Michael Bacall, an actor, was represented by Jeffrey Shumway, an attorney, who provided "legal/management services and [Chief Content Officer] services." Bacall alleged Shumway failed to disclose he was "inactive" with the State Bar, and Bacall terminated the contract with Shumway and his company […]
Efforts By Employers To Have An Arbitrator Decide A Dispositive Part Of A PAGA Claim Continue To Founder. The wreck of the Atlantic. c1873. Currier and Ives. Library of Congress. The Court of Appeal holds that the delegation of the question whether plaintiffs are "aggrieved employees" to an arbitrator frustrates the purpose of the […]
Commercial Arbitration And Labor Arbitration Agreements Are To Be Analyzed The Same Way. American Nurses somewhere in England, November 2018. Library of Congress. When the agreement is silent about who decides whether a dispute is arbitrable, does the court or the arbitrator decide? The court decides. However, 9th Circuit case law created an exception […]
Shivkov v Artex Risk Solutions Arises From Tax Shelter Gone Sideways . . . The numerous Plaintiffs in Shivkov, et al v. Artex Risk Solutions, Inc., et al, No. 19-16746 (9th Cir. 9/9/20) (Smith, Fisher, Hawkins), probably felt that the Artex Risk Solutions was a misnomer by the time they brought suit. Defendants allegedly […]
A Case To Read On The Limits Of The Delegation Doctrine. Neal Moritz, the film producer and industry executive associated with the Fast and Furious (FF) franchise, sued Universal City Studios LLC and others for breach of an oral contract and promissory estoppel after the distributor allegedly removed him as lead producer of the […]
Elders In Both Cases . . . Arbitration And An Elder Abuse Act Case. Dougherty v. Roseville Heritage Partners, et al., C087224 (3rd Dist. 3/30/20) (Krause, Murray, Hoch) is another of the many elder care facility cases in which the enforceability of an arbitration clause is at issue. Here, the trial court denied the […]
Intervening Supreme Court Law Means Earlier Ninth Circuit Law Is No Longer Good Law. ERISA claims may be the subject of mandatory arbitration: that's the holding and threshold issue in Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., 18-15281 (9th Cir. 8/20/19) (Pearson, Gould, Ikuta). To reach this result, the panel needed to conclude that […]