Shivkov v Artex Risk Solutions Arises From Tax Shelter Gone Sideways . . . The numerous Plaintiffs in Shivkov, et al v. Artex Risk Solutions, Inc., et al, No. 19-16746 (9th Cir. 9/9/20) (Smith, Fisher, Hawkins), probably felt that the Artex Risk Solutions was a misnomer by the time they brought suit. Defendants allegedly […]
Plaintiffs Sued Uber Technologies Under The ADA Because It Did Not Provide Accessible Ride Sharing In New Orleans. The interesting set of facts in Namisnak v. Uber Technologies et al., No. 18-15860 (9th Cir. 8/24/20) (Nelson, J.), is that the disabled plaintiffs who sued Uber under the ADA because Uber failed to provide an […]
The Court Distinguishes Or Refuses To Follow Similar Cases Involving Nonsignatories. The Court affirms the confirmation of an arbitrator's award in favor of a nonsignatory auto manufacturer in Dina C. Felisilda et al., v. FCA US LLC, No. C086043 (3rd Dist. 7/24/20) (Hoch, Robie, Murray) (filed 7/24, certified for publication 8/14/20). "The Felisildas' claim against […]
But Arbitration Is Enforceable Between Employee And His Employer (Except As To PAGA Claims). Enforcing an arbitration clause can sometimes become a sticky wicket, glue pot, or dog's breakfast when the party seeking enforcement must rely on more than one document. Such was the case for the defendants seeking to compel arbitration in Thomas Jarboe […]
The US Supreme Court Was In Agreement About This One. The Supreme Court has held unanimously, with Justice Sotomayor concurring, that the "New York Convention does not conflict with the enforcement of arbitration agreements by nonsignatories under domestic-law equitable estoppel doctrines." GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, […]
Additional Insured Had Tried To Avoid Arbitration By Arguing It Was Not A Party To Arbitration Agreement. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. SMG Holdings, Inc., No. C082841 (3rd Dist. 12/31/19) (per curiam), "concerns whether a binding arbitration clause in an insurance policy issued by plaintiff Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co., applies to a third […]
The Security Agreement Included An Arbitration Clause, But The Purchase Agreement Did Not. It is not unusual for a consumer to execute more than one agreement at the time of purchase, only one of which contains an arbitration clause. Such was the case in Fuentes v. TMCSF, Inc., E066242 (4/2 8/23/18) (Ramirez, Slough, […]
Court Of Appeal Rejects Third-Party Beneficiary, Agency, And Judicial Estoppel Arguments Made By U-Haul. Unable to find "any authority addressing precisely analogous circumstances," the Court of Appeal decides a case of first impression in Jensen v. U-Haul Co. of California, E065887 (4/2 12/11/17) (Codrington, McKinster, Slough). The case involves "an attempt to enforce […]
Waiver, Invited Error, And Sharp Practices Doom The Appeal. Justice Ikola grabs the reader by the lapels in the opening lines of Diaz v. Professional Community Management, Inc., G053909 (4/3 certified for pub. 11/8/17) (Ikola, O'Leary, Aronson): "A 'sharp practice' is defined as a 'dealing in which advantage is taken or sought unscrupulously. […]
Equitable Estoppel And Agency Theories Required The Employee To Arbitrate With The Non-Signatory Company. I suspect that that the facts in our next case are far from unique. In Garcia v. Pexco, LLC, G052872 (4/3 4/24/17) (Ikola, Aronson, Thompson) (unpublished), plaintiff Garcia was hired by Real Time, a temporary staffing company, and assigned […]