District Court May Not Decide Whether The Arbitrator "Got It Right" On March 19, 2012, the United States Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari in an interesting employment company-wide gender discrimination case. Sterling Jewelers Inc. v. Jock, 646 F.3d 113 (2nd Cir. 2011), cert. den., 2012 WL 3356. The […]
Could Choice of Law and Procedural Unconscionability Provide A Lifeboat For Class Action Plaintiffs After AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion? Our latest arbitration case out of the Ninth Circuit contains an interesting twist on the analysis of collective-arbitration waivers in consumer contracts. Coneff, et al. v. AT&T Corp., et al., No. No. 09-35563 (9th Cir. […]
Court Also Lays Bare The Policy Consequences For The Privatization Of Consumer Justice In Kilgore v. KeyBank, No. 09-16703 & No. 10-15934 (9th Cir. March 7, 2012) (authored by Judge Trott) (for publication), the Ninth Circuit resolves an FAA preemption issue dividing the district courts, lays bare the policy consequences for consumer justice, […]
Court Highlights Limited Scope of Review of the Final Award Under the FAA – As Compared to Under California Law Appellant Biller worked as an in-house attorney for Toyota Motor Sales (TMS). In 2007, Biller presented TMS with a claim of constructive wrongful discharge related to TMS’s alleged unethical discovery practices. The dispute […]
Delegation to the Arbitrator of the Power to Decide Whether the Arbitration Clause is Unconscionable Is “Horse of a Different Color” That Must Satisfy High Evidentiary Standard The employer, CantorCo2e, L.P., and an executive, appealed from an order denying their petition to compel arbitration of the claims under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) […]
Arbitration Provision Drafted By Employer in Contract of Adhesion Was Too One-Sided The next case, though unpublished, nicely lays out principles relevant to an arbitration clause in the employment context, including procedural and substantive unconscionability, Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preemption, and severability. Mayers v. Volt Managemnt Corp.,Case No. G045036 (4th Dist. Div. 3 […]