August 12, 2021 Was A Day Rich In 9th Circuit Arbitration Decisions. Santiago Lim v. TForce Logistics, LLC, No. 20-55564 (9th Cir. 8/12/21) (Smith, Owens, Robreno). This case is about the gateway decision of arbitrability, delegation of that decision, and unconscionability. The panel holds that the delegation and arbitration clauses are procedurally and substantively […]
There Is A Method To This . . . Before I get to the case, I should mention that I'm playing "catch up." I've fallen somewhat behind on posting, between a busy mediation calendar and some travel to visit a newly born child in the family. But it's the weekend, so let's see how […]
The Majority Looks At The Amount-In-Controversy In The Underlying Dispute, And The Concurring Opinions Looks At The Amount Involved In The Discovery Dispute. The panel in Maine Community Health Options v. Albertsons Companies, Inc., No. 20-35931 (9th Cir. 3/31/21) (Hurwitz, Fletcher; Watford concurring) determines how "the amount-in-controversy requirement in 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) is […]
A SCOTUS Case Effectively Overruled An Earlier Ninth Circuit Opinion. In Damian Langere v. Verizon Wireless Services, No. 19-55747 (9th Cir. 12/29/20) (Bumatay, Parker, Watford), the court holds, "the voluntary dismissal of claims following an order compelling arbitration does not create appellate jurisdiction." The rule had been otherwise in the Ninth Circuit in […]
The Hague Service Convention Between The US And China Did Not Apply Because . . . The first sentence of an opinion is often an arrow pointing to where the court is headed. So it is in Rockefeller Technology Investments (Asia) VII v. Changzhou Sinotype Technology Co., Ltd., S249923 (Cal. S.Ct 4/2/20) (Corrigan, J.): […]
Appealability Under The Mandatory Fee Arbitration Act Is Different Than Appealability Under The California Arbitration Act. The holding of Levinson Arshonsky & Kurtz LLP v Kim (2/1 5/29/19) (Weingart, J.), is that an order denying a petition to compel an MFAA arbitration is not appealable. Therefore, the Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction to […]
Majority Rejects State Law Rule That Ambiguous Contracts Are Interpreted Against The Drafter Because . . . Frank Varela, an employee of Petitioner Lamps Plus, Inc., sued Lamps Plus because a hacker tricked Varela's employer into disclosing tax information about 1,300 employees. Mr. Varela was understandably miffed after a fraudulent income tax return was […]
Case Is Remanded So District Court Can Assess Jurisdictional Issue. The plaintiff-appellant Mr. Castro took on a job as a deck hand on ship. His employment agreement contained a mandatory arbitration provision and it required arbitration to occur in and be subject to the procedural rules of American Samoa. After severely injuring himself, […]
Tribal Sovereign Immunity Was At Issue. Lawsuits filed against Indian tribes trigger issues of tribal sovereign immunity and jurisdiction. Such was the case in Findleton v. Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians, A150444 (1/2 9/25/18) (Stewart, Kline, Richman). This is the third appeal concerning contractor Findleton's efforts to enforce arbitration clauses against the Coyote […]
Defendant, A United Arab Emirates Bank, Lacked Sufficient Contacts With The US. The court staff summary of this case states: "The panel reversed the district court's judgment compelling arbitration of claims concerning a contract and remanded for dismissal on the ground that the district court lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant." InfoSpan, Inc., et al. […]