Using AI to Parse the Logic of a Legal Opinion

We published an article entitled “Using AI to Parse the Logic of a Legal Opinion.” You can read the article by clicking here. 

We applied Claude Sonnet 4.6 to the recent Supreme Court tariff case, Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, striking down Trump’s tariffs under the statutory authority relied upon by the administration. 

The opinion, with concurrences and dissents, is 170 pages long as a slip opinion. We used AI to parse the logic and assumptions of the multiple opinions. This is an “actual use case” demonstrating the advantages of using AI for legal analysis.