In California, There Is No Universal Rule That Arbitrator Or Court Decides Whether A Class Action Can Be Arbitrated — It Depends On The Agreement. The United States Supreme Court has held that a party may not be compelled to submit to class arbitration unless there is an express contractual basis for concluding the […]
The Issue: Do Employee Agreements To Waive Class Actions And Arbitrate Violate The Right Of Employees To Engage In Collective Action Under The National Labor Relations Act? Amy Howe reports on June 19, 2017, in SCOTUSBlog, that the Office of the Solicitor General, after the change of administration, has done a volte-face in a […]
Nor Is There Federal Arbitration Act Preemption. In a long-awaited and important decision, the California Supreme Court addresses the validity of a provision in a predispute arbitration agreement that waives the right to seek “public injunctive relief” as a statutory remedy in any forum. McGill v. Citibank, N.A., No. S224086 (Sup. Ct. 4/6/17). Reversing the […]
Ninth Circuit Case of Morris v. Ernst and Young Is One Of The Three Cases. On December 9, 2016, I linked my article on "The Politics of Arbitration" to this blog. In that article, I predicted, "Morris [v. Ernst and Young] could serve as a springboard for sending divergent opinions about the enforceability of arbitration […]
In The Fifth Circuit, D.R. Horton Inc. v. NLRB, 737 F.3d 344, Is Dispositive. In an unpublished opinion, Citigroup Technology, et al. v. NLRB, 15-60856 (5th Cir. 12/8/16) (per curiam), the Fifth Circuit grants Citigroup’s Petition for Review, and reverses the NLRB’s decision adverse to Citigroup, which seeks to enforce arbitration of an employee’s […]
The Circuits Disagree About Class Action Waivers In Arbitration, The NLRA, And Prohibition Of “Concerted Activities” In Pursuit Of Employees’ “Mutual Aid Or Protection”. On October 11, 2016, I blogged that on September 8, a petition for a writ of certiorari had been filed by the accounting firm in Morris v. Ernst & […]
On August 23, 2016, I blogged that the issue in Morris v. Ernst & Young was clearly framed by the majority and minority opinions, and almost certainly headed for Supreme Court Review. In that Ninth Circuit case, the majority held that an employer violates sections 7 and 8 of the National Labor Relations […]
Jost On Justice Poses The Question. In his August 28, 2016 post, Prof. Kenneth Jost suggests, as I did in my August 23, 2016 post about Morris v. Ernst & Young, that the split among the circuits concerning the enforceability of employment contract clauses requiring disputes to be resolved through individual arbitration is likely […]
Judge Ikuta Dissents: “This decision is breathtaking in its scope and in its error . . . “ The issue decided in Morris v. Ernst & Young, No. 13-16599 (9th Cir. 8/22/16) is clearly framed by the majority and dissenting opinions, and almost certainly headed for Supreme Court review. In a majority opinion authored […]
Enforceability Of Arbitration Provisions Is Uncertain, Threatening To Upset The Settlement Applecart. Joel Rosenblatt, reporting for Bloomberg on August 18, 2016, explains why San Francisco District Court Judge Edward Chen’s rejection of a class-settlement between Uber and its drivers may now give Uber the upper hand: the Ninth Circuit is poised to rule on […]